If you aren’t sure what services you require, reach out to us. We are happy to assist.
Talk to us +44(0)1733 391377
Talk to us +44(0)1733 391377
Date: 20 July 2021
Whilst organisations have been changed overnight by the pandemic and hybrid working is being widely considered and implemented to varying degrees, pay parity will remain important regardless of where employees are based. This speaks to fundamental fairness within an organisation. Dan Pink’s influential text Drive underlines the importance of employers taking pay off the table as an issue.
By satisfying fair pay, employers can unlock the overall effectiveness of the reward strategies they have in place and pay structures are an important consideration in the reward strategy design. What does your organization want to achieve in the long run? Your HR and reward strategy should underpin the wider business vision and align each individual to achieve this together. This is the starting point when selecting the right pay structure for you.
Exploring the key elements you need to consider when developing a pay structure, including:
Initial research will identify if there are any internal equity concerns to factor into the new pay structure. People want to know they are working for a company who pays fairly and that they are not being underpaid in comparison to a colleague. This applies in law through the Equal Pay Act 2010, but also extends to Gender Pay reporting. The discovery phase exercise of putting in place pay structures can help identify areas of risk from an equal pay perspective.
Our UK Reward Management Survey highlighted how organisations are increasingly looking at their wider demographic pay records to achieve parity of pay throughout the business. 85 per cent of respondents have diversity and inclusion initiatives in place, up from 76 per cent last year, demonstrating the focus on fairness by employers.
When competitors change their reward design, it is tempting to want to pick and choose elements to copy and to pay the most. However, understanding the market position is the start of the process. This will need to be balanced with affordability and the other reward elements in terms of the investments being made, but also the culture. One pay structure will not work identically for another company. When we work with employers to pay structure projects we take an evidence-based approach to guide the selection of the best pay structure.
A key choice will be whether to follow an analytical or non-analytical job evaluation. There are pros and cons to each choice, as there are when it comes to selecting pay ranges or spot rates when it comes to setting salary. We recommend following the analytical method so that decisions around roles and where they fit into the structure can sustain the organisation in the long-run. It also provides a defence in Employment Tribunal proceedings over equal pay too.
By identifying what your employees want from their reward package, this will help to guide the design and any nuances required of the new structure to truly drive employee engagement. Whilst the data analysis part can focus on balancing what is currently being paid against what the market is doing, it is important to meet the needs of stakeholders which should not be assumed. It is important to approach the exercise as a blank slate, with employees given the opportunity to outline what matters to them. Feedback may be more about the importance of internal parity of pay or opportunities to progress that go beyond purely financial equations.
We recommend an implementation period of between 3 – 12 months to ensure the success of the project. Without proper methodology and a strong communications plan, 70 per cent of change projects fail. Bringing your employees with you, by communicating why a revised structure is needed and the benefits to them, will need to be planned as early as possible to achieve maximum buy-in across the organisation.
Employees need to be able to see where they go from here. By having a clear pay structure, employees are equipped with a roadmap for progression. This also supports Line Managers roles as they can all sing from the same hymn sheet, producing more consistent performance management decisions across an organisation.
A clear structure organisation-wide can also assist with managing payroll costs. One third of UK Reward Management Survey respondents anticipate that they will award out of cycle pay increases that account for up to one per cent of their annual pay bill. 78 per cent cite market pressures being behind the decision to make an out of cycle increase, whilst 52 per cent cite internal pay alignment and 28 per cent say they are driven by pay restructures. This matrix of individual decisions affects affordability and control, directly skewing ‘official’ figures for pay awards. Introducing a robust structure can reduce inconsistencies and provide Finance with more budget certainty.
Whether it’s a health check, analysis on your existing job evaluation framework or benchmarking, get in touch with us today so we can help you improve your current approach to pay. To listen to Joe’s advice in full, watch our latest webinar on demand about the key elements you need to consider when developing a pay structure and the main pay structures open to you.
Lead Reward Consultant
Date: 11 February 2026
Date: 11 December 2025
Date: 16 October 2025
Date: 16 February 2026
Date: 11 February 2026
We are a leading source of UK salary data and provide the expertise, insights and tools to help HR professionals manage their pay and reward practices.
Paydata Ltd
24 Commerce Road
Lynchwood
Peterborough
Cambridgeshire
PE2 6LR
Be the first to hear about upcoming events and stay up to date with regular insights on pay and reward.
© Paydata Ltd 2026 All rights reserved | Registered in England no: 3632206 | VAT no: 728 0808 28
Site by i3MEDIA